Incorporating external evidence in trial-based cost-effectiveness analyses: the use of resampling methods
© Sadatsafavi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 25 September 2013
Accepted: 19 May 2014
Published: 3 June 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Sep 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Moriarty|
|30 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Crown|
|16 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Mohsen Sadatsafavi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 May 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Mohsen Sadatsafavi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 May 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|3 Jun 2014||Article published||10.1186/1745-6215-15-201|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.