Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Incorporating external evidence in trial-based cost-effectiveness analyses: the use of resampling methods


DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-201

Received: 25 September 2013

Accepted: 19 May 2014

Published: 3 June 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
25 Sep 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Moriarty
30 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Crown
16 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Mohsen Sadatsafavi
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Mohsen Sadatsafavi
Resubmission - Version 4
16 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 May 2014 Editorially accepted
3 Jun 2014 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-15-201

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute for Heart and Lung Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia
Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Institute, University of British Columbia
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa
School of Public and Population Health, University of British Columbia