Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

FAIRY: a randomized controlled patient-blind phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (Ferinject®) to placebo in patients with acute isovolemic anemia after gastrectomy - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

  • Daniel Reim1, 2,
  • Young-Woo Kim1Email author,
  • Byung Ho Nam3,
  • Mi-Jung Kim1,
  • Jeong Hwan Yook5,
  • Young Kyu Park6,
  • Sung Hoon Roh7,
  • Wan Sik Yu8 and
  • Jae Moon Bae4Email author
Contributed equally

DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-111

Received: 16 December 2013

Accepted: 4 March 2014

Published: 5 April 2014



Isovolemic anemia (decrease in hemoglobin concentration with normal or even increased blood volume) after gastric cancer surgery may negatively influence short- and long-term outcomes. Therefore correction of isovolemic postoperative anemia is supposed to be beneficial. This prospective randomized placebo-controlled multicenter trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy of ferric carboxymaltose administration with the primary end point of successful hemoglobin level increase by 2 g/dl at 12 weeks after randomization.

Methods and design

Gastric cancer patients after oncologic resection and postoperative hemoglobin level ≥ 7 g/dl to <10 g/dl at postoperative days 5 to 7 will be eligible for trial inclusion. After randomization, 450 patients (225 per group) are going to be subjected either to administration of ferric carboxymaltose (treatment group) or normal (0.9%) saline (placebo group). Patients will be blinded to the intervention. Patients will undergo evaluation for hemoglobin level, hematology and quality of life assessment 3 and 12 weeks after randomization.


Correction of isovolemic postoperative anemia in gastric cancer patients after oncologic resection is considered to be beneficial. Administration of ferric carboxymaltose is considered to be superior to placebo for anemia correction without the possible risks of red blood cell transfusion. Further, improved quality of life for patients with quick recovery of hemoglobin levels is expected.

Trial registration

NCT01725789 (international: and NCCCTS-12-644 (NCC, Korea).


Ferric carboxymaltose Isovolemic postoperative anemia Gastric cancer Randomized controlled trial


Perioperative anemia occurs in 25% to 75% of cancer patients, and the prevalence of anemia in the immediate postoperative period after major surgery is as high as 90%[1, 2]. Postoperative acute isovolemic anemia (decrease in hemoglobin concentration with normal or even increased blood volume) can affect the recovery and quality of life (QoL) of patients by subtly slowing the reaction time, deteriorating memory, increasing heart rate, and decreasing oxygen levels[3, 4]. It has been suggested that low hemoglobin levels may affect oncologic outcomes in gastric cancer patients[5, 6]. Jung et al. revealed that low hemoglobin levels were related to postoperative complications[5]. Further, it was demonstrated that postoperative anemia resulted in decreased overall survival[6]. Therefore correction of postoperative anemia is an important issue. However, transfusion guidelines and patient blood management programs are not commonly implemented so far. This is reflected by the fact that postoperative transfusion rates for colorectal and gastric cancer patients were reported to be 10% to 38%[7, 8]. It was demonstrated before that transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) carries substantial risks for patients and may even worsen postoperative oncologic longterm outcome[9, 10]. Those risks may be acute hemolytic reactions, transfusion-related acute lung injury, immunization events, organ dysfunctions, and failures and the possibility of incorrect transfusions. The best evidence so far is derived from a meta-analysis for red blood cell transfusions in colorectal cancer patients which concludes that RBC transfusion is related to higher cancer recurrence and decreased survival rates[11]. This data was also confirmed for other tumor entities such as pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma[12, 13]. Therefore alternative procedures to classical RBC-transfusion should be considered of highest interest. Iron supplementation may be a conceivable alternative. However, oral iron intake was reported to be related to a considerable amount of side effects[14] which can be hypersensitivity, paresthesia, hypotension, dyspepsia, vomiting, abdominal pain, myalgia/arthralgia, and pyrexia. Further, dietarian supplementation may be hampered by substantially affected resorption from the GI-tract after gastric cancer surgery[14]. Therefore intravenous iron supplementation is a substantial alternative. However, iron dextran infusion is considered to be rarely related to potentially life-threatening side effects[15]. Alternatively ferric carboxymaltose was proposed to be safer regarding the common side effects of intravenous (iv-) iron infusion[15].

In a retrospective observational study performed at the sponsor site the role of intravenous iron was assessed before[16]. Postgastrectomy patients treated with iron sucrose had a faster and more complete Hb-response compared to untreated patients and none of the treated patients developed chronic anemia 12 months after surgery. Further, no adverse events related to iron infusion were noted. However, selection bias could not be ruled out in this study, because in this retrospective analysis the percentage of advanced gastric cancer patients treated by intravenous iron was higher than in the non-treated group. Therefore we propose this randomized placebo controlled phase III trial in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose supplementation for correction of postoperative isovolemic anemia in gastric cancer patients.


Study population, inclusion, and exclusion criteria

All patients with a hemoglobin-level ≥ 7 g/dl to <10 g/dl at postoperative days 5 to 7 after oncologic gastrectomy for gastric cancer will be eligible for screening. All patients aged 20 years and over and willing to give informed consent will be eligible. Participation in another trial interfering with the outcome of this study, language problems, lack of compliance, mental inability, unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 6 months of the trial, severe respiratory disease, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Score >3, inadequate liver, kidney, and bone-marrow functions (evaluated by measurement of white blood cell count (WBC), platelets, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and creatinine), pregnancy/lactation, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status >1 will be considered unspecific exclusion criteria. Further, patients with a known history of hypersensitivity or allergy to ferric carboxymaltose, active inflammatory disease (surgical, site infection, pneumonia, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)), history of previous erythropoietin or iv-iron administration within 4 weeks prior to screening, history of iron overload (hemochromatosis) and anemia due to reasons other than iron deficiency will not be eligible for this trial. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the National Cancer Center Korea on 7 November 2012 (NCCCTS-12-644). All participating centers approved the trial by their local IRBs subsequently. Further, the trial was registered in the clinical trials database (NCT01725789) (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Study scheme of FAIRY trial, inclusion/exclusion criteria, intervention, and end points.


General procedures

After consenting to participate in the trial, patients will be randomized to either one of the two treatment groups (500 to 1,000 mg ferric carboxymaltose (Ferinject®) vs. placebo (0.9% saline)). After inclusion of eligible patients medical history will be taken and all concomitant diseases and medications will be recorded. All trial participants will receive routine examination and blood testing for the following parameters: hemoglobin, RBC, WBC, platelets, serum ferritin, transferrin saturation, AST, ALT, CRP, and creatinine.

Assessment of quality of life

Quality of life (QoL) as one of the most important secondary endpoints will be assessed by standardized European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C-30, and STO-22 (EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life) questionnaires, which are already broadly established and validated. Crawford and Cella[17] reported that the maximal incremental gain in QoL occurs when the hemoglobin level lies in the range of 11 to 13 g/dL. Differences in QoL were even noted when the Hb-level was only 1 g/dL lower. Therefore we hypothesize that rapid Hb-nomalization by intravenous iron administration may improve QoL. As such, QoL will be assessed at multiple time points postsurgery during the follow-up visits.


The treatment group will be administered ferric carboxymaltose (1,000 mg for bodyweight ≥50 kg or 500 mg for bodyweight <50 kg (maximum dose of ferric carboxymaltose: 20 mg/kg)) as iv-drip infusion over an administration time of at least 15 (1,000 mg) or 6 (500 mg) min. All patients with a serum ferritin level of <15 ng/mL and Hb-level <10 g/dl at postoperative week 3 will receive a second administration of 500 mg ferric carboxymaltose as described above. The placebo group will receive normal saline (0.9%) as iv-drip infusion (200 mL for bodyweight ≥50 kg or 100 mL for bodyweight <50 kg) over an administration time of at least 15 (200 mL) or 6 (100 mL) min. During infusion patients will be blinded.


Follow-up visits will take place at 3 and 12 weeks (±7 days) after the study intervention. On the follow-up visits patients will undergo blood testing and QoL evaluation as described above.

Study objectives

Primary endpoint

The primary efficacy endpoint will be the number of responders defined as an increase of the hemoglobin level of at least 2 g/dl related to the baseline hemoglobin measured after randomization at 12 weeks after administration of either placebo or ferric carboxymaltose.

Secondary endpoints

Major secondary endpoints will be: percentage of patients with Hb ≥10, 11, and 12 g/dL at 3 and 12 weeks (independent of alternative anemia management including transfusion or use of erythropoietin stimulating agents), percentage of patients requiring alternative anemia management therapy, average time-to-response (Hb increase ≥2 g/dL and/or Hb ≥10 g/dL) (independent of alternative anemia management including transfusion or use of erythropoietin stimulating agent, development of Hb, ferritin, and transferrin saturation over the study duration (12 weeks) independent of alternative anemia management including transfusion or use of erythropoietin stimulating agents and finally safety/tolerability of ferric carboxymaltose. QoL as one of the most important secondary endpoints will be assessed by EORTC QLQ C-30 and STO-22 questionnaires at 3 and 12 weeks.

Methods against bias

Randomization into two treatment groups will be performed in order to omit selection bias from this trial. Randomization will be performed as block randomization in fixed block sizes in a 1:1 allocation ratio using a centralized web-based randomization system (eVelos ( In order to achieve equal group sizes randomization will be stratified for each respective center (six centers). Further, patients will be stratified according to the need of adjuvant chemotherapy depending on the surgical/pathological stage (adjuvant CTx in patients with clinical/surgical/pathological stages II to IV according to UICC/AJCC[18]). Patient blinding will rule out possible influences on QoL assessment. Patients and observers for postoperative outcomes will be blinded to guarantee an optimal study outcome. Potential confounding will be reduced by the randomization process.

Sample size calculation, statistical considerations, and trial feasibility

The sample size is based on a superiority design assuming a response rate to ferric carboxymaltose of 75% (per primary endpoint definition) by week 12. A response rate of 60% is assumed in the control group. This results in a 15% advantage for the treatment group which is considered medically meaningful. In order to achieve a statistically significant result with 90% power at a significance level of α = 0.05, 400 patients are required to be randomized according to the Pocock formula[19]:
n = f α , β × p 1 × 100 - p 1 + p 2 × 100 - p 2 / p 2 - p 1 2

where p1 and p2 are the response rates in the control and experimental groups, respectively, and f(α, β) = [Φ - 1(α/2) + Φ - 1(β)]2.

To account for potential patient drop-outs over the 12-week study period, the sample size is estimated at 450 patients (225 per group). Although this number appears to be rather high, recruitment should be accomplished within several months. Each of the six participating centers treats at least 500 patients for gastric cancer every year which sums up to a volume of 3,000 patients per year. Based on the assumption of an incidence rate of 15% for postoperative anemia (18% in the sponsor’s institution) 400 patients may be recruited within one year.

The outcome parameters will be analyzed by a Pearson chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test (patient age and gender, clinicopathologic data, and morbidity) and Student’s t-test (Hb-level before treatment and hospital days after treatment). The Z-test will be used to determine whether or not a significant difference exists between two groups during follow-up.


Stopping rules of the study medication will not apply due to a single administration of ferric carboxymaltose. However, in case of hypersensitivity or anaphylactic reactions immediate interruption of infusion will be mandatory. Further management will be left to the discretion of the physician on duty. Any (serious) adverse event ((S) AE), any (unexpected) (serious) adverse drug reaction, and any suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction (SUSAR) will be documented. All SAEs, SADs, and SUSARs will have to be documented and reported to the IRB by the responsible investigator according to local regulations.

Documentation and data handling

All information required by the study protocol and collected during this trial will be entered in the electronic case report form (eCRF) using the web-based eVelos system ( The completed eCRFs will be reviewed and signed by the investigator or subinvestigator and sent to the independent data management group in the eVelos team. Quality control is going to be enforced by site visits and CRF review. The data will be handled, managed, and analyzed according to appropriate regional standard operating procedures. The study will be conducted in accordance with ICH-GCP and the Declaration of Helsinki.


Postoperative anemia occurs in around 18% of patients after oncologic gastrectomy[16]. This signifies a considerable amount of patients in need of hemoglobin correction and prevention of chronic anemia. For gastric cancer patients high level evidence derived from prospective studies on anemia correction other than RBC transfusion are not available yet. Therefore we propose this prospective randomized placebo controlled trial.

Primary efficacy endpoint of this prospective study is the number of treatment responders after administration of either placebo or ferric carboxymaltose. Response is defined as an increase of the hemoglobin level of at least 2 g/dl related to the baseline hemoglobin 12 weeks after randomization. A hemoglobin level of 10 g/dl will be used as a cutoff value for our study based on the guidelines published by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology for the treatment of cancer-related anemia, recommending Hb <10 g/dl as a treatment threshold[20]. The increase of 2 g/dl was chosen on the basis of the former FERGIcor trial[21], which defined treatment responders to ferric carboxymaltose when the hemoglobin level increased by 2 g/dl 12 weeks after initiation of treatment and revealed significant improvements in QoL.

After gastrectomy, damage on the gut may impact the ability of the patient to absorb iron from diet, limiting correction of iron deficiency anemia[22]. Therefore an intravenous compound was chosen for this trial. To date, over 3,600 subjects were treated by ferric carboxymaltose in various clinical studies. Across those clinical studies[14, 15, 21, 23], replenishment of iron stores was consistently observed. In subjects with more severe or prolonged iron deficiency, anemia correction using ferric corboxymaltose consistently resulted in medically significant increases of Hb values. This improvement was usually found within 2 weeks. In addition to the correction of laboratory parameters, iron replacement therapy demonstrated significant improvements of QoL and functional status. In phase III studies, ferric carboxymaltose (Ferinject®) was reported to have improved tolerability and fewer side effects than iron sucrose[24] together with faster correction of postoperative anemia.

Postoperative anemia may increase tumor resistance to possibly necessary adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients. It was found that anemia is the strongest prognostic factor for oncologic outcomes of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy[25]. Anemic patients revealed significantly lower response rates and overall survival rates than those with regular Hb-levels. Therefore it is of utmost interest to improve Hb-levels for postoperative AGC patients who are supposed to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy in a curative setting. Besides that, baseline Hb may be lower for advanced gastric cancer patients due to a higher risk of blood loss due to more invasive surgery (open procedure, more aggressive lymph node dissection, and longer operating time) compared to early gastric cancer patients. As the improvements on QoL may be more pronounced in this group, AGC patients will have to be stratified in a subgroup analysis.

Conclusively there is emerging evidence that patient blood management for postoperative isovolemic anemia may be superior to just observation or red blood cell transfusion. The proposed study represents a well powered randomized placebo-controlled trial in order to elucidate the influence of ferric carboxymaltose substitution on correction of isovolemic anemia and QoL in gastric cancer patients.

Trial status

Recruiting. The first patient was randomized in January 2013.




Adverse event


Advanced gastric cancer


Alanine aminotransferase


Aspartate aminotransferase


C-reactive protein


Early gastric cancer


Erythropoiesis stimulating agent


Ferric carboxymaltose




Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase




Human chorionic gonadotropin


Iron deficiency


Iron deficiency anemia


Lactate dehydrogenase


Overall survival


Progression-free survival


Quality of life


Serious adverse event


Suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction


Tranferrin saturation


Total iron binding capacity.



Young Sook Kim and Susie Kim cordially have supported this trial in the role of a research coordinator. This trial is funded by Viphor Pharma & JW Joongwae Medical.

Authors’ Affiliations

Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center
Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
National Cancer Center, Biometric Research Branch, Research Institute for National Cancer Control & Evaluation
Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
Asan Medical Center
Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital
Yonsei University Health System Severance Hospital
Gastric Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Medical Center


  1. Shander A, Knight K, Thurer R, Adamson J, Spence R: Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Med. 2004, Suppl 7A: 58S-69S.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Gombotz H, Rehak PH, Shander A, Hofmann A: Blood use in elective surgery: the Austrian benchmark study. Transfusion. 2007, 47: 1468-1480. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01286.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Weiskopf RB, Kramer JH, Viele M, Neumann M, Feiner JR, Watson JJ, Hopf HW, Toy P: Acute severe isovolemic anemia impairs cognitive function and memory in humans. Anesthesiology. 2000, 92: 1646-1652. 10.1097/00000542-200006000-00023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Weiskopf RB, Feiner J, Hopf HW, Viele MK, Watson JJ, Kramer JH, Ho R, Toy P: Oxygen reverses deficits of cognitive function and memory and increased heart rate induced by acute severe isovolemic anemia. Anesthesiology. 2002, 96: 871-877. 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jung DH, Lee HJ, Han DS, Suh YS, Kong SH, Lee KU, Yang HK: Impact of perioperative hemoglobin levels on postoperative outcomes in gastric cancer surgery. Gastric Cancer. 2013, 16: 377-382. 10.1007/s10120-012-0196-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Liang YX, Guo HH, Deng JY, Wang BG, Ding XW, Wang XN, Zhang L, Liang H: Impact of intraoperative blood loss on survival after curative resection for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2013, 19: 5542-5550. 10.3748/wjg.v19.i33.5542.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Adachi Y, Mimori K, Mori M, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K: Morbidity after D2 and D3 gastrectomy for node-positive gastric carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1997, 184: 240-244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Weber RS, Jabbour N, Martin RC: Anemia and transfusions in patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008, 15: 34-45. 10.1245/s10434-007-9502-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Eder AF, Chambers LA: Noninfectious complications of blood transfusion. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007, 131: 708-718.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wu HS, Little AG: Perioperative blood transfusions and cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 1988, 6: 1348-1354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Amato A, Pescatori M: Perioperative blood transfusions for the recurrence of colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, 1: CD005033Google Scholar
  12. Kneuertz PJ, Patel SH, Chu CK, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Delman KA, Staley CA, Kooby DA: Effects of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on disease recurrence and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011, 18: 1327-1334. 10.1245/s10434-010-1476-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang CC, Iyer SG, Low JK, Lin CY, Wang SH, Lu SN, Chen CL: Perioperative factors affecting long-term outcomes of 473 consecutive patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009, 16: 1832-1842. 10.1245/s10434-009-0448-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Qunibi WY, Martinez C, Smith M, Benjamin J, Mangione A, Roger SD: A randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous ferric carboxymaltose with oral iron for treatment of iron deficiency anaemia of non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011, 26: 1599-1607. 10.1093/ndt/gfq613.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bisbe E, García-Erce JA, Díez-Lobo AI, Muñoz M, Anaemia Working Group España: A multicentre comparative study on the efficacy of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose and iron sucrose for correcting preoperative anaemia in patientsundergoing major elective surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2011, 107: 477-478. 10.1093/bja/aer242.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yoon HM, Kim YW, Nam BH, Reim D, Eom BW, Park JY, Ryu KW: Intravenous iron supplementation may be superior to observation in acute isovolemic post-gastrectomy anemia. World J Gastroenterol. 2014, 20: 1582-1857. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i6.1582.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Crawford J, Cella D, Cleeland CS, Cremieux PY, Demetri GD, Sarokhan BJ, Slavin MB, Glaspy JA: Relationship between changes in hemoglobin level and quality of life during chemotherapy in anemic cancer patients receiving epoetin alfa therapy. Cancer. 2002, 95: 888-895. 10.1002/cncr.10763.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. UICC: TNM classification of malignant tumours. Edited by: Sobin LH, Wittekind C. 2010, New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, 7Google Scholar
  19. Pocock SJ: Clinical trials: a practical approach. 1983, New York: John Wiley & Sons LtdGoogle Scholar
  20. Rizzo JD, Brouwers M, Hurley P, Seidenfeld J, Arcasoy MO, Spivak JL, Bennett CL, Bohlius J, Evanchuk D, Goode MJ, Jakubowski AA, Regan DH, Somerfield MR, American Society of Clinical Oncology; American Society of Hematology: American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Society of Hematology clinical practice guideline update on the use of epoetin and darbepoetin in adult patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28: 4996-5010. 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.2201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Evstatiev R, Marteau P, Iqbal T, FERGI Study Group: FERGIcor, a randomized controlled trial on ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2011, 141: 846-853. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.06.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lim CH, Kim SW, Kim WC, Kim JS, Cho YK, Park JM, Lee IS, Choi MG, Song KY, Jeon HM, Park CH: Anemia after gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: long-term follow-up observational study. World J Gastroenterol. 2012, 18: 6114-6119. 10.3748/wjg.v18.i42.6114.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Anker SD, Comin Colet J, Filippatos G, Willenheimer R, Dickstein K, Drexler H, Luscher TF, Bart B, Banasiak W, Niegowska J, Kirwan BA, Mori C, von Eisenhart Rothe B, Pocock SJ, Poole-Wilson PA, Ponikowski P, FAIR-HF Trial Investigators: Ferric carboxymaltose in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361: 2436-2448. 10.1056/NEJMoa0908355.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pfenniger A, Schuller C, Christoph P, Surbek D: Safety and efficacy of high-dose intravenous iron carboxymaltose vs. iron sucrose for treatment of postpartum anemia. J Perinat Med. 2012, 40: 397-402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Park SH, Nam E, Bang SM, Cho EK, Shin DB, Lee JH: A randomized trial of anemia correction with two different hemoglobin targets in the first-line chemotherapy of advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008, 62: 1-9. 10.1007/s00280-007-0561-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Reim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.