Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effectiveness of acupuncture intervention for neck pain caused by cervical spondylosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

  • Qinghui Que1,
  • Xiaode Ye3,
  • Quangui Su3,
  • Yan Weng3,
  • Jianfeng Chu2,
  • Lijuan Mei2,
  • Wenwen Huang3,
  • Renhui Lu3 and
  • Guohua Zheng2Email author

DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-186

Received: 16 November 2012

Accepted: 6 June 2013

Published: 22 June 2013



Neck pain caused by cervical spondylosis has become a common health problem worldwide among >40-year-old adults. Acupuncture intervention is one of the most popular treatment measures for this disorder. However, evidence for its efficacy in relieving neck pain and recovering neck physiological function has not been established in randomized, placebo-controlled trials. The primary aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of active acupuncture compared with sham acupuncture intervention for neck pain caused by cervical spondylosis.


We will conduct a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial comparing active acupuncture with placebo (sham acupuncture). A total of 456 patients with neck pain caused by cervical spondylosis who meet the eligibility criteria from outpatient clinics of the Second People’s Hospital of Fujian Province and the Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine will be recruited and randomized into an active acupuncture or sham acupuncture group. The participants will undergo treatment sessions with either active or sham acupuncture intervention five times a week for 2 weeks. Evaluation by blinded assessors at baseline and at intervention for 1 and 2 weeks will include demographic characteristics, validated questionnaires (Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) scale, Short-Form 36 (SF-36) scale, and McGill pain scale), examination of neck physiological function, and adverse events. All included patients will be followed up and investigated for relapse of neck pain at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after intervention.


This paper describes the rationale and design of a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that aims to determine the efficacy and safety of acupuncture intervention for neck pain caused by cervical spondylosis. The primary outcomes are changes in the NPQ score and neck physiological function. Secondary outcome measures include quality of life, adverse events, and relapse of neck pain. If successful, this project will provide evidence of the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for neck pain caused by cervical spondylosis.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-TRC-12002206.

Registration date: 11 May 2012.


Acupuncture Efficacy and safety Neck pain caused by cervical spondylosis Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial


Cervical spondylosis (CS) is defined as age-related chronic disc degeneration. It is also defined as vertebral osteophytosis secondary to degenerative disc disease, which in the cervical spine may be asymptomatic or can present as pure axial neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, cervical myelopathy, or cervical myeloradiculopathy [1, 2]. Neck pain caused by CS (CS neck pain) is associated with slight degenerative changes within the intervertebral disc in early CS [3]. CS is usually asymptomatic, but may present with symptoms of neck pain, neck stiffness, or even shoulder pain and stiffness. Its etiological factors are multifactorial and involve poor posture, anxiety, depression, neck strain, and sporting or occupational activities [4]. With acceleration of the pace of modern life, computers, air conditioning, fans, and cars have become widely used, and CS neck pain has become a common health problem worldwide. It is reportedly associated with a 50% incidence of radiological evidence in individuals over the age of 40 years and an 85% incidence of radiological evidence in individuals over the age of 60 years [5]. Neck pain is one of the most frequent issues among patients with CS. About two-thirds of adults in the UK reportedly experience neck pain at some time in their lives, with men more commonly affected than women, at a ratio of 3:2 [6]. A Norwegian survey of 10,000 adults showed that 34% of respondents had experienced neck pain in the previous year [7]. In Hong Kong, the prevalence of neck pain caused by CS is 15% to 17%, and the lifetime prevalence is 30% to 50% [8]. Approximately 33% of adults in Canada and 43% in Sweden had experienced neck pain in the past several months [9, 10].

Non-surgical treatment is usually the most appropriate course of initial management. Most CS neck pain responds to conservative measures. Stress management or postural advice in daily activities, work, and hobbies is effective for some patients with slight neck pain. The current clinical treatments mainly include administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, muscle relaxants, physiotherapy, analgesics, and so on [11]. However, there is little evidence to support the efficacy of these therapies for CS neck pain. The most optimal treatment has not yet been established.

Traditional Chinese medicine measures, such as acupuncture, massage, neck exercises and so on have been extensively used for the management of CS neck pain in China and other countries; among these, acupuncture is one of the most popular measures. A number of clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate its efficacy [1216]. Their results suggested that acupuncture is effective for pain relief in the immediate and short-term post-treatment period; however, the efficacy of a mid-term to long-term benefit for pain control or functional improvement was less clear [1719]. Furthermore, comparative trials in the literature are few in number and of poor quality. Therefore, we will conduct a rigorous evaluation to test whether acupuncture performs better than placebo for treatment of CS neck pain.

The overall goal of this project is to determine the relative effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for CS neck pain.


Study design

This study will be a randomized, double-blind, parallel controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for CS neck pain. A total of 458 subjects with CS neck pain from outpatient clinics will be recruited and randomly allocated to either the active acupuncture group (experimental group) or the sham acupuncture group (control group). The Second People’s Hospital of Fujuan and the Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital, Fujian University of Chinese Medicine will be responsible for recruiting, screening, and intervention of all patients and assessment of all outcomes. Management of the randomization sequence, blinding, and data analyses will be carried out by the Center for Evidence Based Medicine of Fujian Traditional Chinese Medicine University. Ethics approval has been received from Fujian Traditional Chinese Medicine University. Informed written consent will be obtained from all participants.


We will include patients between 18 and 60 years of age with CS neck pain. Patients must have typical symptoms of neck pain and stiffness, but their cervical vertebrae must be normal or show only physiological curvature changes on radiographic examination. Potentially eligible participants are being identified through screening of patient medical records at the participating hospitals. Screening of patients will be performed by one of the authors according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A flow diagram of the patients is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Flow diagram of participants.

Inclusion criteria

To be eligible, participants must fulfill the following criteria: (1) a confirmed diagnosis of CS neck pain in accordance with the diagnostic criteria published by the Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine (2010) [20] and with reference to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10) codes ( M47.812 (other spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy (cervical region)); (2) male or female 18 to 60 years of age; (3) with/without positive signs of musculoskeletal system upon physical examination; (4) pain intensity ranging from 3 to 7 points on a visual analog scale (VAS) upon recruitment; (5) no acupuncture or other relative treatment within the last 7 days; and (6) informed consent document has been signed.

Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) history of neck trauma or T1 to T6 thoracic vertebra trauma; (2) has vertebral body or spinal canal cancer, tuberculosis, or severe osteoporosis; (3) history of neck surgery or presence of congenital malformation of the cervical vertebrae; (4) pregnant or lactating (women) or presence of a mental disorder; (5) has a severe systemic disease such as cardiocerebrovascular disease, tumors, diabetes mellitus, kidney disease, or digestive system disease; (6) inability to complete research questionnaires; and (7) rejection of randomization.

Sample size

The sample size calculation was based on a reference of a similar intervention in similar patient groups using the same primary outcome instrument [21]. The primary outcome measure is improvement of scores in neck pain as measured with the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) at the end of treatments. According to previous research [21], the mean and standard deviation of NPQ scores were (24.04 ± 11.83) in the placebo group and (20.71 ± 11.91) in the acupuncture group. The sample size was calculated based on the formula:
n 1 = n 2 = 2 z α / 2 + z β M e M c 2 δ 2

with a type I error of 5% (α = 0.05) and 80% power (β = 0.2). A total of 198 patients are required in each group to show statistical differences between the groups. We estimated that 15% patients will drop out of the study; thus, 456 patients was established as the sample size.

Randomization and allocation

The randomization schedule will be prepared by the Evidence-Based Medicine Center of the Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The specific randomization lists will be computer-generated using the SAS 8.12 software PLAY PLAN program (SAS software (Beijing) Co., Ltd, No. 1 Changan Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing , China) and concealed from the screeners, assessors, and patients by a designer from the Evidence-Based Medicine Center who is not involved in the study. Cards with group assignments and detailed treatment schedules will be prepared by the Evidence-Based Medicine Center and sealed in opaque envelopes. These sealed envelopes will be marked with the patients’ sequential numbers and kept by the screeners who are responsible for the screening of participants. When a patient has been enrolled, written informed consent has been obtained, and the patient has completed the baseline measurements and is confirmed to be an eligible participant, the envelope corresponding to the sequential number of the patient will be transmitted to the acupuncturist. The acupuncturist will open the envelope and perform the intervention (active or sham acupuncture) according to the treatment schedule written on the card. The information of the allocation list will remain confidential and kept by the acupuncturist not involved in participant recruitment or outcome assessment, and this information will not be shared with the data analyzers or outcome assessors.


The outcome assessors will be blinded to the randomization allocation and will not be involved in performance of the interventions. Participants will be blinded to the group allocation and will not know whether they have been treated with active or sham acupuncture. It will be impossible to blind the acupuncturists because they will perform the interventional protocols. However, the acupuncturists will not take part in the outcome measurements or the statistical analyses, and will be requested not to disclose details about their treatment to the outcome assessors or participants. The statistician will be blinded to the group allocation until completion of the statistical analyses.


The intervention scheme originates from the guidelines of diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation for CS [20] and has been practiced for some time in the Second People’s Hospital of Fujian Province and the Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital, Fujian University of Chinese Medicine. We hypothesized that acupuncture for CS neck pain would have a more positive effect in terms of relieving neck pain and recovering neck physiological function than placebo (sham acupuncture). Therefore, participants in the experimental group will receive the active acupuncture treatment, and participants in the control group will receive the sham acupuncture treatment. All participants will receive 25 mg of diclofenac sodium three times a day if their VAS scores exceed 5.

Active acupuncture

Active acupuncture treatment will be applied to the participants in the experimental group. Active acupuncture stimulation will be performed at the acupuncture points Jing-jiaji (EX-B2.C5), Jing-jiaji (EX-B2.C6), Jing-jiaji (EX-B2.C7), and Jianzhongshu (Sl15) on both sides of the body [22]. Sterile single-use acupuncture needles (40 mm in length and 0.30 mm in diameter; Hwato brand, Suzhou Medical Products Factory Co., Ltd., 12–14 West Qilin lane, Suzhou, China) will be perpendicularly inserted to a depth of 20 to 30 mm at the selected stimulation point. When the treated participants achieve de qi sensation (soreness, numbness, distention, and heaviness), electroacupuncture with its anode connected to Jing-jiaji (EX-B2.C5) and cathode connected to Jing-jiaji (EX-B2.C7) will be performed to stimulate the relevant acupuncture points for 20 minutes by a single experienced acupuncturist using a continuous-wave, 1-Hz frequency and a comfortable strength.

Sham acupuncture

Sham acupuncture treatment will be applied to the participants in the control group. The operation of sham acupuncture will be same as that of active acupuncture with the exception of the sites and depth used. Sham acupuncture stimulation will be performed at sites 1.5 cm away from Jing-jiaji (EX-B2.C5), Jing-jiaji (EX-B2.C6), Jing-jiaji (EX-B2.C7), and Jianzhongshu (Sl15), and the depth of the inserted needles will be controlled within 15 mm. The operation of electroacupuncture in the control group will be same as that in the experimental group.

Intervention regimen

Patients will be required undergo ten treatment sessions at a frequency of five sessions a week, and the intervention will be completed in 2 weeks. All electroacupuncture procedures will be performed with a Hwato brand SDZ-II electronic needle therapy instrument made by Suzhou Medical Products Factory Co., Ltd. The two groups will be separated from the treatment, which will be performed by a single acupuncturist.

Follow-up period

During the 12-week unsupervised follow-up period, no participants will undergo special therapy with the exception of routine cervical care. At post-treatment weeks 4, 8, and 12, the outcome assessor will telephone participants to investigate the recurrence of neck pain.

Outcome measurement

The following baseline descriptive data will be obtained by questionnaire and physical examination: age, sex, marital status, education level, employment status, family history of CS, VAS score of cervical pain, function of cervical vertebrae, and previous health problems. The radiographic severity of cervical vertebral changes will be assessed on X-ray images. A summary of all measures in the trial is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Study assessments, procedures, and timetable


Before grouping

First intervention period (5 days/week)

Second intervention period (5 days/week)

Follow-up Period

Time point (day)


1 to 7


8 to 14





Case diagnosis



Inclusion criteria



Exclusion criteria



Informed consent



Baseline information log



Physical examination



Visual analog scale score



Randomization allocation



Neck physiological function examination






Intervention and record






Adverse events record






McGill pain score






Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire score







Short-Form 36 measure







Neck pain relapse






Primary outcome measures

The primary outcomes are changes in the symptoms of CS and function of the cervical vertebrae. Symptoms of CS will be measured using the NPQ [22]. Function of the cervical vertebrae, mainly including the activity of the cervical vertebrae upon forward bending, lateral bending, and rotation, will be measured using physical examination and assessed by the outcome assessors.

Secondary outcome measures

Quality of life will be assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire [23]. Neck pain will be assessed using the McGill Pain Questionnaire [24]. The recovery period is defined as the number of days from the beginning of treatment to recovery of cervical physiological function and will be recorded by the outcome assessors. Relapse of neck pain will be recorded by telephone investigation during the follow-up period.

Safety evaluation

Any adverse events (defined as any functional lesion caused by the interventions, such as local bleeding at the needle insertion point; local numbness, pain, or dizziness during treatment and so on) will be recorded during treatment. If any adverse event occurs, the doctor will provide the corresponding treatment to the patient. The adverse events will be immediately reported to the primary investigator and ethics committee to decide if the patient needs to withdraw from the trial.

Data collection and management

The demographic and baseline characteristic data will be collected by screeners when the patients are recruited. Clinical outcome measurement and questionnaire-based assessment of treatment effects and neck physiological function will be measured by the outcome assessors after the treatment is completed. During the follow-up period, relapse of neck pain will be investigated by a telephone call at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post treatment.

Research assistants will conduct quality control of data collection and be responsible for data entry. The data manager will be responsible for initial data cleaning, identifying, coding, and conversion into the proper format for data analysis.

Statistical analysis

The primary outcomes will undergo intent-to-treat analysis based on the initial treatment assignment and focus on assessment of the main effects of the acupuncture treatment for CS at symptoms of CS and function of the cervical vertebrae. Analyses will be performed using IBM SPSS 20 (version 20.0, IBM Corp., New York, NY, USA). The continuous variables and descriptive values will be expressed using means with standard deviations or medians with ranges. For the variables with a normal distribution, statistical comparisons between the groups will be made by using a t test. If the variables have a non-normal distribution or ordinal level, statistical comparison between groups will be made using the Mann–Whitney U test. Measures with a discrete distribution will be expressed as percentages and analyzed by the χ 2 or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. The amount of extra diclofenac sodium used between the experiment and control groups will be analyzed, and a general linear model will be applied to adjust its confounding influence if necessary.


In this randomized, double-blind controlled trial of patients with CS neck pain, we intend to investigate the mid-term efficacy and safety of acupuncture for CS neck pain. This is a well designed study in strict accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement of randomized controlled trials and will enable determination of the effects of acupuncture [25]. First, we estimated the most optimal sample size to ensure adequate test performance. Second, we ensured that this study is truly a randomized controlled trial to the greatest extent possible by full implementation of randomization and blinding. In addition, to assess the efficacy of acupuncture for CS neck pain, the placebo effect should be avoided. At present, ‘sham acupuncture’ is considered to be the most commonly proposed placebo control. In this protocol, sham acupuncture is applied by adapting the depth of needling at non-acupuncture points. This technique has been widely used in clinical trials, many of which have adopted this method as a control [2630]. Its main advantages are that it is the strongest type of patient blinding and is easy to carry out. Its main problem is that the control group may play a role in the treatment of the disease; thus, the effect of acupuncture maybe be underestimated [31]. However, if the experimental results prove that acupuncture is indeed better than the control group treatment, the efficacy of acupuncture for CS neck pain will be positive. In terms of evaluation indicators, we will use a reasonable specification, design a rigorous professional scale as the evaluation indicator of the primary outcome, and avoid a subjectively developed fuzzy classification evaluation, distorting data less and reducing bias. The interventions (active or sham acupuncture) will be performed by a fixed chief physician, who has more than 20 years of clinical experience. This will improve the participants’ compliance and reduce the risk of dropout.

In summary, we have combined a proper clinical trial design and acupuncture features and finished a scientific design. We will report the clinical trial results in accordance with international norms for randomized controlled trial reporting (CONSORT) [25] and acupuncture clinical trial intervention reporting standards (Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA)) [32]. This study has also been pasted by the Ethics Committee of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine; consequently, the results of this study will generate scientifically rigorous clinical evidence for the study of CS.

Trial status

Ongoing recruitment.


Authors’ Affiliations

Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital, Fujian University of Chinese Medicine
Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Rehabilitation Medicine College, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine


  1. Rao RD, Currier BL, Albert TJ, Bono CM, Marawar SV, Poelstra KA, Eck JC: Degenerative cervical spondylosis: clinical syndromes, pathogenesis, and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007, 89: 1360-1378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Joseph SB, Oner FC, Poynton AR, O’Byrne JM: Degenerative cervical spondylosis: natural history, pathogenesis, and current management strategies. Adv Orthop. 2012, 201: 916987-Google Scholar
  3. Ferrara LA: The biomechanics of cervical spondylosis. Adv Orthop. 2012, 2012: 493605-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Binder A: Cervical spondylosis and neck pain. BMJ. 2007, 334: 527-531. 10.1136/bmj.39127.608299.80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Nishi Y, Nakamura M, Yabe Y, Shiga H: MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998, 80: 19-24. 10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.7929.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassidy JD, Carroll L: The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey: the prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine. 1998, 23: 1689-1698. 10.1097/00007632-199808010-00015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Urwin M, Symmons D, Allison T, Brammah T, Busby H, Roxby M, Simmons A, Williams G: Estimating the burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the community: the comparative prevalence of symptoms at different anatomical sites, and the relation to social deprivation. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998, 57: 649-655. 10.1136/ard.57.11.649.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Lau EM, Sham A, Wong KC: The prevalence of and risk factors for neck pain in Hong Kong Chinese. J Public Health Med. 1996, 18: 396-399. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cote P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L: The treatment of neck and low back pain: who seeks care? Who goes where?. Med Care. 2001, 39: 956-967. 10.1097/00005650-200109000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaeob T, Zeev A, Epstein L: Low back pain - a community-based study of care-seeking and therapeutic effeetiveness. Disabil Rehabil. 2003, 25: 67-76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Borenstein DG: Chronic neck pain: how to approach treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2007, 11: 436-439. 10.1007/s11916-007-0230-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lei H, Zhou W, Wei R: Clinical efficacy analysis on acupuncture and massage combined treatment of cervical spondylosis. J Xinjiang Med Univ. 2012, 35: 656-658.Google Scholar
  13. Wang JG, Zhou B, Yan HT, Zhang L, Liu Z, Jia R, Hu D: Effect of acupuncture, ultrashort wave, in combination with orthopedic tuina in the treatment of cervical spondylopathy [in Chinese]. Chinese J Trad Med Traumatol Orthop. 2011, 19: 14-16.Google Scholar
  14. Dong WK, Lin XH: Clinical observation on cervical spondylosis of neck type treated with acupuncture at original and terminal points of trapezius [in Chinese]. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2012, 32: 211-214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Witt CM, Jena S, Brinkhaus B, Liecker B, Wegscheider K, Willich SN: Acupuncture for patients with chronic neck pain. Pain. 2006, 125: 98-106. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Willich SN, Reinhold T, Selim D, Jena S, Brinkhaus B, Witt CM: Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture treatment in patients with chronic neck pain. Pain. 2006, 125: 107-113. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.06.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wolsko PM, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Kessler R, Phillips RS: Patterns and perceptions of care for treatment of back and neck pain: results of a national survey. Spine. 2003, 28: 292-297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Trinh KV, Graham N, Gross AR, Goldsmith CH, Wang E, Cameron ID, Kay T, Cervical Overview Group: Acupuncture for neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, 19: CD004870Google Scholar
  19. White P, Lewith G, Prescott P, Conway J: Acupuncture versus placebo for the treatment of chronic mechanical neck pain. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004, 141: 920-928. 10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Professional Committee of Cervical Spondylosis: Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Rehabilitation for Cervical Spondylosis. 2010, Beijing, China: Chinese Association of RehabilitationGoogle Scholar
  21. Liang Z, Zhu X, Yang X, Fu W, Lu A: Assessment of a traditional acupuncture therapy for chronic neck pain: a pilot randomised controlled study. Complement Ther Med. 2011, 19 (Suppl 1): S26-S32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Leak AM, Cooper J, Dyer S, Williams KA, Turner-Stokes L, Frank AO: The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, devised to measure neck pain and disability. Br J Rheumatol. 1994, 33: 469-474. 10.1093/rheumatology/33.5.469.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ruta D, Garratt A, Abdalla M, Buckingham K, Russell I: The SF 36 health survey questionnaire: a valid measure of health status. BMJ. 1993, 307: 448-449.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Melzack R: The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975, 1: 277-299. 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG: Consort 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMJ. 2010, 340: c869-10.1136/bmj.c869.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Biernacki W, Peake MD: Acupuncture in treatment of stable asthma. Resp Med. 1998, 92: 1143-1145. 10.1016/S0954-6111(98)90409-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Fireman Z, Segal A, Kopelman Y, Sternberg A, Carasso R: Acupuncture treatment for irritable bowel syndrome. Digestion. 2001, 64: 100-103. 10.1159/000048847.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fink M, Wolkenstein E, Karst M, Gehrke A: Acupuncture in chronic epicondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. Rheuma-tology. 2002, 41: 205-209. 10.1093/rheumatology/41.2.205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith C, Crowther C, Beilby J: Acupuncture to treat nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial. Birth. 2002, 29: 19-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Shapira MY, Berkman N, Ben-David G, Avital A, Bardach E, Breuer R: Short-term acupuncture therapy is of no benefit in patients with moderate persistent asthma. Chest. 2002, 121: 1396-1400. 10.1378/chest.121.5.1396.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewith G, Vincent C: Evaluation of the clinical effects of acupuncture a problem reassessed and a framework for future research. Pain Forum. 1995, 4: 29-39. 10.1016/S1082-3174(11)80073-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. MacPherson H, Jobst KA: Improving the reporting of interventions in clinical trials of acupuncture: the updated and revised STRICTA. J Altern Complement Med. 2010, 16: 929-930. 10.1089/acm.2010.0558.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Que et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.