Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
© Williamson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 13 March 2012
Accepted: 13 July 2012
Published: 6 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hywel Williams|
|11 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joy MacDermid|
|15 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith|
|9 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Elizabeth Gargon|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|9 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|13 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|6 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1745-6215-13-132|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.