Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review

  • Natalie McGauran1Email author,
  • Beate Wieseler1,
  • Julia Kreis1,
  • Yvonne-Beatrice Schüler1,
  • Heike Kölsch1 and
  • Thomas Kaiser1
Trials201011:37

DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-37

Received: 7 November 2009

Accepted: 13 April 2010

Published: 13 April 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Nov 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gowri Raman
20 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Norma Terrin
12 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - S. Nassir Ghaemi
19 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Natalie McGauran
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Natalie McGauran
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Apr 2010 Editorially accepted
13 Apr 2010 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-11-37

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care

Advertisement