Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review
© McGauran et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 7 November 2009
Accepted: 13 April 2010
Published: 13 April 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Nov 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gowri Raman|
|20 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Norma Terrin|
|12 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - S. Nassir Ghaemi|
|19 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Natalie McGauran|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Natalie McGauran|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Apr 2010||Editorially accepted|
|13 Apr 2010||Article published||10.1186/1745-6215-11-37|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.